Foresight Institute Logo
Image of nano


Foresight Debate with Scientific American

Foresight Institute vs Scientific American
Debate on nanotechnology: Press Coverage of Round 1


Overview of the Debate

Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 | Round 4 | Epilogue

Round 1 -- Part 1 | Letters | Part 2


C&EN takes note of nanotechnology debate

Chemical & Engineering News (circ. 145,000), a publication of the American Chemical Society, published a news item discussing the debate on nanotechnology between Foresight Institute and Scientific American. Excerpts follow:

Nanotechnologists use web to rebut Scientific American article

A group of nanotechnologists who don't like the tone and content of an article on nanotechnology in the April Scientific American have responded to it in an innovative way. In addition to the usual approach of submitting a letter to the editor, they posted a point-by-point rebuttal...and alerted people about the posting by email...

But in a lengthy rebuttal, posted on the web just after the issue of Scientific American was published, Merkle details his view that the article is biased against nanotechnology and is inaccurate. He points out that the web makes it possible for such "inaccurate and misleading information [to be] rapidly squelched."


Round 1 -- Part 1 | Letters | Part 2

Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 | Round 4 | Epilogue

Overview of the Debate

 

Foresight Programs

 

Home About Foresight Blog News & Events Roadmap About Nanotechnology Resources Facebook Contact Privacy Policy

Foresight materials on the Web are ©1986–2016 Foresight Institute. All rights reserved. Legal Notices.

Web site developed by Stephan Spencer and Netconcepts; maintained by James B. Lewis Enterprises.