Quantum propulsion?

Quantum propulsion?

From the TR Physics Arxiv blog:

The quantum vacuum has fascinated physicists ever since Hendrik Casimir and Dirk Polder suggested in 1948 that it would exert a force on a pair of narrowly separated conducting plates. Their idea was eventually confirmed when the force was measured in 1997. Just how to exploit this force is still not clear, however.
In recent years, a new way of thinking about the quantum vacuum has emerged which has vastly more potential. And today, one physicist describes how it could be used to create propulsion.

…Today, Alex Feigel at the Soreq Nuclear Research Center, a government lab in Yavne Israel, suggests an entirely new way to modify the momentum of the quantum vacuum and how this can be exploited to generate propulsion….

But Feigel says the two others offer entirely new ways to exploit the quantum vacuum using magnetoelectric nanoparticles to interact with the electromagnetic fields it contains.
The first method is to rapidly aggregate a number of magnetoelectric nanoparticles, a process which influences the boundary conditions for higher frequency electromagnetic waves, generating a force.
The second is simply to rotate a group of magnetoelectric nanoparticles, which also generates a Lorentz force.
Either way, the result is a change in velocity. As Feigel puts it: “mechanical action of quantum vacuum on magneto-electric objects may be observable and have a significant value.”

The beauty of Feigel’s idea is that it can be easily tested. He suggests building an addressable array of magnetoelectric nanoparticles, perhaps made of a material such as FeGaO3 which has a magnetoelectric constant of 10^-4 in a weak magnetic field.
These nanoparticles simply have to be rotated in the required way to generate a force. Feigel calls it a magnetoelectric quantum wheel.
Of course, nobody is getting a free lunch here. “Although the proposed engine will consume energy for manipulation of the particles, the propulsion will occur without any loss of mass,” says Feigel. He even suggests, with masterful understatement, that this might have practical implications.

A magneto-electric quantum wheel, Alexander Feigel, Sorec NRC, Israel



By | 2017-06-01T14:05:18+00:00 December 11th, 2009|Found On Web, Nanodot|3 Comments

About the Author:


  1. James Gentile December 11, 2009 at 7:48 pm - Reply

    If you don’t lose mass, how is it NOT a free lunch? Ok, you need some mass, but you just keep using the same mass forever, that’s like buying 1 lunch and getting infinite for free, no? I admit I know little about physics, so if someone could explain it in laymans terms I’d appreciate it.

  2. Tim C December 14, 2009 at 10:45 am - Reply

    It would still cost energy to move around the magneto-electric particles. Some of that energy would then be converted into propulsion. What’s nice here is that you don’t use up the particles that generate the propulsion. So it’s not a free lunch, but it is a reusable lunch box.

  3. Doug Jones December 21, 2009 at 1:31 am - Reply

    If some energy input can produce some “reactionless” impulse of x N.s/J, is x a constant? If so, you can produce a free energy machine by having the quantum thruster move a mass along a track at some finite velocity- unless, as I suspect, the conversion factor makes the quantum drive power/thrust ratio identical to a photon drive.

    Alas, if it works, it creates thrust no more efficiently than a flashlight.

Leave A Comment