Biotech's troubles: Lessons for Nanotech

from the technology-for-all-not-just-the-rich dept.
Senior Associate BryanBruns reports "A well-written white paper on Transgenic Plants and World Agriculture argues that farmers in poor countries need better access to plant biotechnology. A working group from the US National Academy of Sciences the Royal Society of London, and scientific academies in other nations prepared the paper. (See also stories in the Washington Post and NandoTimes). This paper offers good examples of thinking through how to steer technology so it can benefit farmers and others in poor countries, not just commercial interests in wealthy countries. The report encourages better sharing of intellectual property. The whole report is worth reading, if you are interested in preparing society for advanced technologies, but if you're pressed for time you could look at the summary and the chapter on intellectual property".Read More for Bryan's full post.

STM triggers nanoscale self-assembly

from the those-clever-Canadians dept.
Senior Associate GinaMiller points out a report from the NRC on their breakthrough work using a scanning probe to stimulate the automatic self-assembly of organic molecules into lines on a chip surface: While much work remains to be done, they are optimistic about the prospects of nanotechnology…"The appeal of the technique is that we've limited the need for arduous atom-by-atom crafting of structures with an STM, and unleashed a spontaneous process to automatically drive nanostructure growth…" See their animation.

Nanotech: Open Source or Proprietary?

from the Drexler-says-"Let's-patent-matter-&-its-use" dept.
Paul Hughes reposts from Transdot: It's quite possible the assembler won't be for sale, at least not to the general public. Large companies who can afford a 10-50 billion dollar price tag, may likely obtain licensing rights for its use, but that's a far cry from the average joe owning it…Hopefully, the first company to develop this assembler will not obtain all-inclusive patent rights thereby allowing a sufficient number of competitors to enter the race. Read More for the full post and a response.

Nanoweapons = chemical weapons?

from the OK-so-they're-BIG-chemicals dept.
MarkGubrud has pointed out that the 1996 Chemical Weapons Convention includes a strong verification, monitoring, and challenge inspection system (unlike, say, the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention). Given this, I wonder whether it wouldn't be easier to have nanotech weapons classified as a (large) form of chemical weapon, rather than writing a whole new treaty which would then need to be adopted?

DARPA research effort in molecular electronics

from the Rice-calls-it-"Moleware" dept.
TomKalil writes "DARPA has recently released a call for proposals in molecular electronics (MoleTronics). One of the technical goals of the program is to demonstrate densities of 1011 devices/cm2. See link for a description of existing DARPA-funded research on molecular electronics at HP and UCLA, Rice, Notre Dame, Harvard, Penn State, etc." From the call for proposals: "The second task is hierarchical self-assembly, i.e., bridging the nano- to the micro-worlds. This can be described as a set of processes that will first assemble individual devices, then create functional nano-blocks (e.g., memory and/or logic) from those devices, and finally the interconnection amongst said nano-blocks to form computationally functional circuits (modules) with a reasonable input and output methodology. Innovative interconnect and input/output concepts (e.g., multiplexing and demultiplexing schemes) are solicited."

Fling: Making DNS, TCP, and UDP Untraceable

from the bits-from-the-underground dept.
"Fling is a new suite of internet protocols that perform the function of DNS, TCP, and UDP in a manner that's both untraceable and untappable. Fling protects clients from servers, servers from clients, and both from an eavesdropper in-between. The result is that anyone can serve or retrieve any data, without fear of censure." I haven't given the technical description of the protocols more than a once-over; does anybody see a fundamental problem with them?

Foresight Gathering Sept 8-10, Palo Alto

from the brain-overload-party dept.
Register by August 1 to save $100 on this fall's Foresight Senior Associate Gathering. Speakers and participants at previous events in this series include: Bruce Ames, David Brin, Eric Drexler, Esther Dyson, Doug Engelbart, David Friedman, John Gilmore, Robert Hambrecht, Bill Joy, Steve Jurvetson, Brewster Kahle, Ray Kurzweil, Marvin Minsky, Virginia Postrel, Eric Raymond, Paul Saffo, Eric Schmidt, Vernor Vinge & Roy Walford. See comments from participants.

Holographic atom manipulation at NEC

from the Japan-moves-forward?-downward?-or-is-it-upward? dept.
Senior Associate BrianWang writes: An article at NEC discusses their work on atomic beam holography: "In a recent experiment, the joint research team succeeded in making real-time changes in the patterns of neon atoms by applying a bias voltage to an electrode array controlling the hologram. This experiment was a giant step towards the fabrication of complex, three-dimensional, nanometer-order structures. [emphasis added] The goal of our holographic atom manipulation is the nanofabrication of complex semiconductor structures. The technique will involve directly piling germanium and aluminum atoms on the substrate. In addition to increasing density, the new process will save time by eliminating the resist and etching steps in the lithography process."

Remote conference attendance by web-proxy

from the entrepreneurial-opportunity dept.
WillWare can't make it to all the Foresight conferences, and has an idea on how to address this problem: It would be cool to remotely hire somebody (local to the conference) to strap on a wearable computer with a camera, microphone, loudspeaker, and wireless internet connection. I could remotely observe conference goings-on on my home computer, and I could talk to people at the conference. For the amount of time that I was hiring this person, he or she would wear a hat or t-shirt with my name and picture. It might take a T1 line or a cable modem to get acceptable bandwidth, but after a very few conferences it becomes a lot cheaper than airfare, a hotel room, and a rental car. Read More for the full proposal.

Top-down pathway inches downward

from the nano-micro-what's-the-difference dept.
GordonWorley brings our attention to a confused article about a process for sculpting micromachinery (MEMS or MicroElectroMechanical Systems). Regardless of whether MEMS are on the path to nanotech, we're all rooting for improvements to that technology, which is already moving into general use.

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop