UCSD researchers image brain wiring as it forms

from the Making-connections dept.
According to a press release (30 November 2001), researchers at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Divisions of Biology and Physical Sciences have succeeded in imaging the structural changes between neurons in the brain that many scientists believe take place when human brains store short-term and long-term memories. The images show brain cells forming temporary and permanent connections in response to various stimuli, and provide evidence for how nerve connections in the brain are changed temporarily and permanently by our experiences. Their research results were reported in the 30 November 2001 issue of Cell.

Jobs in nanotech?

Reid Maker writes "Hello, I am a senior in college graduating with a B.A. in computer science and history. I am also incredibly interested in the oncoming nano world, and have been reading any article I have gotten my hands on for the past few years. Are there commercial nano centers where people can find employment? Or even in the university setting? I would really like to be a part of the oncoming nano revolution, but am not exactly sure how. I have been eyeing a number of industries for next year, but I really haven't found anything about the nano job marketplace. If anyone has any information on this, it would greatly be appreciated. Thanks for your input!"

NSF, EC will cooperate on some nanotech programs

from the International-nanotech dept.
In another sign of the expanding internationalization of nanotechnology-related research and development, the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the EC announced in a press release (3 December 2001) an expanded a program of workshops and funding of mutual research goals in materials science, to include nanotechnology. Under the cooperative program, research goals will be determined jointly by U.S. and European researchers. NSF grants will support the U.S. side of research teams in areas such as surface structure and thin films, carbon nanotubes and the role of defects in materials. The EC will fund the Europeans' participation. The new program expands on a previous agreement that began in 1998.

More news from Nanotech Planet conference

from the The-buzz dept.
A spate of news items about nanotechnology has emerged in the wake of the Nanotech Planet conference held last week in Boston. Some items of interest:

Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?

Nick Bostrom writes "I have a new paper, setting forth what I call the 'Simulation Argument'. It's located at http://www.simulation-argument.com

ABSTRACT. This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a "posthuman" stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the transhumanist dogma that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed."

Zyvex facilitates cooperation between UTD, Jilin U in China

from the International-nanotech dept.
Vik writes "Looks like Zyvex's trip to China has bourne fruit. The Dallas Business Journal is reporting here that Jilin University is to share research with the University of Texas at Dallas. It's good to see such cooperation, particularly in the current climate of distrust, and highlights that ultimately nanotechnology is for the benefit of all.
Vik :v)"

[Editor's note: more detailed information on this cooperative venture between UTD and Jilin University can be found in this press release on the UTD website.]

Investors comment on nanotech as industry

from the at-least-nano-has-a-business-model dept.
"Nanotech Offers Some There, There" by Ann Thayer (Chemical & Engineering News, 11/26/01, not easy to access) discusses the nanotech industry and current investor interest. Galway Partners' Chris Anzalone: "I believe there will be a nanotech boom over the next three to five years. The difference [from dot.coms], of course, is that there will be more there, there." Merrill Lynch's John Roy: "Where there's smoke, there's fire. Nanotechnology is closer than we think, and we need to be watching this. Although no one knows how big this will be, we do know that it never will match the hype." (Might Mr. Roy someday wish he'd left off that last comment?) A chart shows that venture capital is already about double US federal spending on "nanotechnology".

New academic Centers with nano orientation

from the put-Nano-in-your-name-&-get-funded dept.
"New Hubs for Nano" by Alexandra Stikeman (Technology Review, Dec 2001) lists six new academic Centers for various flavors of nanotechnology. Some of them sound intriguing, e.g. RPI's Center for Directed Assembly of Nanostructures, whose director is quoted: "Lots of people can now make nanoscale building blocks. The question is how do you assemble them to create new materials and novel devices that you can control and manipulate." Time will tell whether they live up to these sexy nano-names.

HP researcher cautions against nanotech investment hype

An article on the Small Times website ("HP Official: 'Ignorance and greed' could spoil nanotech's credibility", by Jeff Karoub) reports an address to the Nanotech Planetís Fall 2001 Conference and Expo in Boston on 29 November 2001, by R. Stanley Williams, a leading nanotechnology researcher and director of Hewlett-Packardís Quantum Science Research. According to the article, Williams said a major challenge facing the immature nanotechnology field is not the science, but the combination of misleading media reports and venture capitalists looking for the next big thing in the wake of the dot-com collapse.
"Ignorance and greed meeting in the marketplace is a recipe for disaster," Williams told attendees from business, government and academia. "As a consequence, the field will lose credibility and momentum."

Williams also noted that even though most nanotech-related research in the United States is funded by the federal government, that funding represents only a tiny fraction of the federal research and development budget, and is unlikely to see any large increases. He said most nanotech research concepts currently go unfunded.

Proposals for a national "NetGuard" for information infrastructure

from the Cyberwarfare dept.
An article in the New York Times ("Plans for Technology National Guard", by Amy Cortese, 26 November 2001) takes a quick look at proposals for the development of a National Emergency Technology Guard, or NetGuard, to develop a corps of people to help protect and restore the information technology systems and infrastructure in the event of physical and, presumably, cyberspace attacks.

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop