Commercial, academic nanotech activity in Illinois

A Chicago Tribune article that provides a snapshot of nanotech-related companies and university research programs in the Chicago region ("Nanotech expands its small world", by Jon Van, 22 October 2001) appears on the Small Times website. The article highlights the increasing level of interest in nanotechnology among researchers, investors, businesses and the general public.

NSF will fund six nanotechnology centers

The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) announced on 19 September 2001 about $65 million in funding over five years to establish six university centers to promote research and education in nanotechnology. The centers will each focus on a specific area in nanoscale science and engineering, and include collaborations with industry and other institutions. The six centers will be located at Columbia and Cornell Universities and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in New York, Harvard University in Massachusetts, Northwestern University in Illinois, and Rice University in Texas. Details are available in this NSF press release.

Additional coverage is available in an article on the Small Times website, and in individual press releases from Northwestern University, Rice University and RPI.

Texas ponders its place in nanotech race

An article from the Dallas Business Journal ("To boldly go… The race is on to capitalize on the potential of nanotechnology", by Jeff Bounds, 7 September 2001) laments the lack of adequate funding and other support for nanotechnology at Texas universities, and ponders whether the state if falling behind in the race to establish a nanotech industry base. The article looks at programs in California, New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois, and ponders what is needed to keep nanotech talent and companies in Texas. The article includes some interesting quotes from James Tour of Rice University and Jim Von Ehr of Zyvex.

Zyvex liaison offers a view of nanotech future

An article from the Dallas Business Journal offers an intersting commentary by Rocky Angelucci, technical liaison for Zyvex ("Science fact or science fiction …", 7 September 2001) on both the promise and the hype surrounding nanotechnology: "Some futurists promise nanotechnology will cure all ills and transform our lives. But how much of this is true and how much is hype? What is nanotechnology really going to bring us? And when?"

After making some short term predictions regarding enhanced materials, molecular electronics, and other possibilities, Angelucci offers a few predictions. Within 10 to 20 years, he says, "It seems likely by this time someone will build the first prototype molecular assembler. Capable of rudimentary picking and placing of individual atoms and molecules, it will accomplish what today's scanning tunneling microscopes can do, only faster and with greater precision. The ability to move atoms and molecules will give rise to very simple molecular machines, most likely for use in the medical field." And within 50 years, "Few doubt we'll have sophisticated, molecular-sized medical machines capable of traveling in the body in order to detect and repair damage at the cellular level" that could lead to (very) smart materials, artificial intelligence and, possibly, the revival of patients in cryonic suspension.

In the same issue, Angelucci also offers a primer on the basic concepts of nanotechnology.

A skeptical view of nanotechnology

from the reacting-to-nanohype dept.
For a skeptical view of the potential benefits of nanotechnology, try this editorial ("Itty bitty miracles", by Jared Kendall, 12 September 2001) from The Advocate in Baton Rouge, Louisiana: "Every decade or so, a new scientific field is hailed as the answer to all our problems. Usually, such claims turn out to be slightly exaggerated. Such is surely to be the case with nanotechnology, a large field of study being built around the really, really small. That isn't to say that nanotechnology won't change our lives. Heck, it already has. It's just that nanotech won't solve all our problems. Technology is never as powerful as its potential."

An update on JINN nanotech research

An article in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer ("UW, Richland lab join in brave new world of nano", by T. Paulson, 10 September 2001) provides an updated look at the work at the Joint Institute for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (JINN), which was established by the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Washington in May 2001.

Rice nanotech researchers offer lighthearted look at chemistry

from the But-is-it-art? dept.
A group of chemists, computer programmers and animators "who believe that science can be art and art can be science", led by molecular electronics researcher James Tour, a professor of chemistry at Rice University, have launched the NANOArtworks website. Although little actual content available on the site as yet, it appears to be aimed at providing a lighthearted look at chemistry for younger students and a general audience.

According to the siteís blurb, the members of the group "believe that chemistry is fun. So fun that we want to share our interest throughout the world by the means of Benny the NanoBoy in the land of Nanoput. In his upcoming movies, you'll not only enjoy the 3D animation and comical storylines, but you'll also walk away with a new-found interest in chemistry."

Purdue highlights new nanotech center

Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, has raised $51 million for the construction of the Birck Nanotechnology Center, according to a major press release issued on 7 September 2001. Additional information about the new center can be found in this related article. The center will be named for Michael and Katherine Birck, who contributed $30 million for Purdue nanotech center. Additional information about faculty research in nanoscience at Purdue is also available.

Directors have big plans for UTD nanotech center

from the deep-in-the-heart-of-Texas dept.
A flurry of news about the Nanotechnology Institute at the University of Texas-Dallas (UTD) appeared during August 2001 surround the appointment of Nobel Prize-winning chemist Alan G. MacDiarmid as chairman of the advisory board of UTD's new NanoTech Institute. MacDiarmid, who was awarded the Nobel in chemistry last year for his discoveries in conducting polymers, has been on faculty of the University of Pennsylvania since 1955, but will join UTD as a scholar in residence. Coverage appeared on Bcentral (20 August), Scripps-Howeard Reporter News (21 August) and Small Times (22 August) websites. According to the reports, MacDiarmid will also act as senior adviser on science and technology to UTD president Franklyn G. Jenifer.

Small Times also published an extensive interview (29 August) that included comments from MacDiarmid and the UDT Nanotech Instituteís new director, Dr. Ray Baughman, on their plans for development of the institute. Another interview with Baughman appeared on the Nanotech Planet website. Baughman assumed his post as director on 4 September 2001.

Issues raised by Bill Joy still being debated

from the reverberations dept.
Pondering the question of whether one can have too much Joy, a set of commentaries on the issues raised by Bill Joy in his (in)famous article in Wired Magazine (April 2000) have been posted on the KurzweilAI website.

(Oh, very well — Joy's original article is still available on the web. Some of the earlier reactions to Joyís arguments were covered in the "Media Watch" column in Foresight Update 41, 42, and 43.)

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop